|
In mathematics, the interior of a set S consists of all points of S that are intuitively "not on the edge of S". A point that is in the interior of S is an interior point of S.
The notion of the interior of a set is a topological concept; it is not defined for all sets, but it is defined for sets that are a subset of a topological space. It is in many ways dual to the notion of closure.
Contents |
If S is a subset of a Euclidean space, then x is an interior point of S if there exists an open ball centered at x which is contained in S.
This definition generalises to any subset S of a metric space X. Fully expressed, if X is a metric space with metric d, then x is an interior point of S if there exists r > 0, such that y is in S whenever the distance d(x, y) < r.
This definition generalises to topological spaces by replacing "open ball" with "neighbourhood". Let S be a subset of a topological space X. Then x is an interior point of S if there exists a neighbourhood of x which is contained in S. Note that this definition does not depend upon whether neighbourhoods are required to be open.
The interior of a set S is the set of all interior points of S. The interior of S is denoted int(S), Int(S), or So. The interior of a set has the following properties.
Sometimes the second or third property above is taken as the definition of the topological interior.
Note that these properties are also satisfied if "interior", "subset", "union", "contained in", "largest" and "open" are replaced by "closure", "superset", "intersection", "which contains", "smallest", and "closed". For more on this matter, see interior operator below.
On the set of real numbers one can put other topologies rather than the standard one.
These examples show that the interior of a set depends upon the topology of the underlying space. The last two examples are special cases of the following.
The interior operator o is dual to the closure operator −, in the sense that
and also
where X is the topological space containing S, and the backslash refers to the set-theoretic difference.
Therefore, the abstract theory of closure operators and the Kuratowski closure axioms can be easily translated into the language of interior operators, by replacing sets with their complements.
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from Wikipedia